The Hidden Costs of Running HR In-House vs. Partnering with a PEO
- Michael Jakob
- Sep 29
- 2 min read
At first glance, it seems cheaper to manage HR internally. But for many New York small businesses, the reality is the opposite. The hidden costs of in-house HR often outweigh the expense of partnering with a Professional Employer Organization (PEO).
The Real Cost of DIY HR
When HR falls on the business owner, office manager, or a junior employee, productivity and accuracy suffer. Consider the following hidden costs:
Time Lost: Business owners in Nassau or Queens can easily lose 10–15 hours a week dealing with HR paperwork, payroll, and compliance. That’s time that could be spent driving sales or serving customers.
Penalties: Mistakes in tax filings, overtime calculations, or state compliance can cost thousands of dollars. New York regulators do not go easy on small employers.
Recruitment and Retention: Without access to competitive benefits, you risk losing good employees to larger competitors in Manhattan or Westchester.
How a PEO Saves Money
A PEO streamlines HR by centralizing payroll, compliance, and benefits management. The result:
Lower Health Insurance Costs: By pooling employees from multiple small businesses, PEOs access lower health insurance premiums than a 20-person company could secure alone.
Reduced Liability: From workplace safety training in Suffolk to sexual harassment prevention in Brooklyn, PEOs keep your business protected.
Time Savings: Business owners gain back their workweek by outsourcing HR functions to professionals.
Example: A Bronx Retailer
A Bronx-based retailer with 12 employees tried to manage HR internally. After a payroll error triggered fines and an unhappy workforce, the owner partnered with a PEO. Within months, payroll accuracy improved, employee turnover dropped, and health benefits were offered at a fraction of the previous cost.
Why This Matters for NY Businesses
In high-cost areas like Long Island and NYC, every dollar counts. A PEO can be the difference between struggling with administrative headaches and thriving as a competitive employer.
Comments